REVIEW ARTICLE | Jan. 30, 2018
Salivary Tumor Markers- A Review
Dr. Sudhir MVS, Dr. Sridhar Reddy Erugula, Dr. Deepika Veldurthy, Dr. Ayesha Sameera, Dr. Mohammed Aziz-ur-Rahman, Dr. Shahid Imran, Dr. Mohammed Umar Farooq, Dr. Divya Jahagirdar
Page no 1-7 |
10.21276/sjodr.2018.3.1.1
The first tumor marker reported was Bence Jones protein in 1846 by
precipitation of a protein in acidified boiled urine. The measurement of Bence Jones
protein has been a diagnostic test for multiple myeloma. The first modern tumor
marker used to detect cancer was human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), a marker
used in pregnancy tests. High level of HCG in the blood may indicate the presence of
a placental malignancy. After pregnancy if the uterus continues to enlarge; then a
high level of HCG in the blood may indicate the presence of a cancer of the placenta
called as Gestational trophoblastic disease. This marker is still used to help in their
diagnosis & to monitor their response to therapy. The first success in developing a
blood test for a common cancer was in 1965, when Carcinoembryonic antigen was
found in the blood of some patients with colon cancer. By the end of 1970s several
other blood tests had been developed for different cancers. Some proteins are
secreted and/or cleaved into the extra cellular milieu and may represent valuable
serum biomarkers for diagnostic purpose. This review is all about the various
salivary tumor markers which help in diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
REVIEW ARTICLE | Jan. 30, 2018
Platelet-rich Fibrin in Sinus Lift Procedures: A Systematic Review
Dr. Saima Shaukat, Dr. Musarrat Siddiqui, Dr. Deborah Sybil
Page no 8-12 |
10.21276/sjodr.2018.3.1.2
The aim of this review was to evaluate literature on the efficacy of
platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a sole grafting material in sinus floor augmentation. The
main advantage of PRF is the avoidance of a second surgical site needed for the
harvest of autologous bone. A PubMed search was carried out, limited to human
studies for articles on PRF as a sole grafting material. 15 unique results were found.
Out of 15, 5 results met our inclusion criteria. All the studies were non-comparative
and were analyzed for sample size, case-selection criteria, surgical technique,
evaluation criteria, success rates and follow-up period. PRF showed promising
results as a grafting material and is a relevant biomaterial for natural bone
regeneration. Further, clinical studies including control groups in the form of
randomized controlled clinical trials are required to establish the efficiency of PRF as
a grafting material in sinus lift procedures.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | Jan. 30, 2018
Predatory publishing: Awareness of academicians of three dental institutions of North India
Dr. Manish Kumar, Dr. Prateek Priyranjan, Dr. Monika Sharma, Dr. Dinesh Chand Sharma, Dr. Manas Bajpai
Page no 13-16 |
10.21276/sjodr.2018.3.1.3
The term „predatory publishing‟ was coined by Jeffery Beall in 2010 for
the journals; unprofessionally exploit the open access model for profit. He also
developed a list of predatory publishers called as Beal‟s list. India emerged as a
world‟s largest base of predatory publishers followed by U.S.A and Nigeria
according to a recent research. Hence the present study was aimed to assess the
knowledge and awareness of faculty members of three different dental colleges in
India regarding predatory publishing.A cross sectional survey was performed in three
different dental institutions with the consent of the ethical board of our Institute. The
study was designed in a questionnaire form which was used to assess the awareness
and knowledge of dental academicians of three different dental institutes of Jaipur
city regarding predatory publishing. In addition printouts of Beall‟s list were given to
the faculty and asked whether they had already published their papers in the journal
given in the list. The data accumulated were grouped and analyzed. Total of 121
faculty members of three different colleges were grouped according to their rank in
the department and analyzed. 30.5% of the faculty members were aware about
predatory journals. Higher proportions of professors and readers were aware about
predatory publishing comparing to senior lecturers. On publication, it was found that
52% of the faculty members published their papers in predatory journals. Adequate
knowledge of dental academicians towards this unethical practice is mandatory
because predatory journals may take away not only your money but also your
prestige and academic reputation.