Dens invaginatus (DI) is a rare developmental anomaly with an unknown etiology and different complexity. It is classified into three types according to Oehler’s classification 1957 based on the extent of invagination. This case involves an upper lateral tooth demonstrating Dens invaginatus type 2, an open apex, and a separate root sheath and diagnosis of necrotic pulp with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessment was conducted prior to nonsurgical root canal treatment, which included apexification with bio ceramic material and internal bleaching to address both healing potential and aesthetics. The procedure was performed under an operating microscope, and a 6-month follow-up was conducted with both clinical and radiographic signs of healing.

The study of the apical bases has been relevant in orthodontics for many decades; its study was carried out both on jaw models and on lateral cephalograms. Dentistry today is impossible without three-dimensional studies, which allows you to study an object from any angle and visualize the smallest changes in the anatomical structures of the area under study. The use of cone beam computed tomography to study the apical bases of the jaws makes it possible to study the configuration, size, and position of both the bases themselves and the structures that form them. The parameters we proposed allow us to study the width, length and angle of inclination of the apical base on single CBCT sections. Clinical use of the proposed analysis will contribute to more complete and accurate orthodontic treatment planning.

Introduction: A successful endodontic treatment is ba¬sed on combination of adequate instrumentation, irrigation and obturation of canal system. The objectives of endodontic irrigants are lubrication of root canal, removal of microorganisms, pulp, dentinal remnants and dissolution of tissues. The objective of root-end filling is establishment of proper apical hermetic seal. Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of various irrigating solutions on push-out bond strength of Biodentine and Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Materials and Method: Sixty-four extracted human single rooted teeth were decoronated 1.5-2 mm coronal to cemento-enamel junction. The root canals were prepared and divided into four groups (n=16): Group I- Normal Saline (Control group), Group II- Triple antibiotic solution, Group III- 2% Chlorhexidine, Group IV- Morinda citrifolia solution. Mid root dentin was sectioned horizontally and irrigated further with respective irrigating solutions for 5 minutes and divided into 2 subgroups: Subgroup A- Biodentine and Subgroup B- MTA. The root-end filling material was incrementally placed and embedded in acrylic blocks. Samples were tested for push-out bond strength using universal testing machine. Results: The highest push-out bond strength was shown by 2% Chlorhexidine group when used with Biodentine and lowest when normal saline was used with Biodentine. Conclusion: All experimental irrigating solutions increased the push-out bond strength of MTA and Biodentine.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lignocaine as a local anesthetic in root canal treatment, particularly focusing on its use in lower teeth, different administration techniques, and its performance in patients with specific challenges such as inflammation or allergy. Methods: A survey-based approach was utilized to gather data from clinicians on their experiences with lignocaine in endodontic procedures. The study assessed the success rates of various techniques, including the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), intraligamentary, and intraosseous injections. The impact of different adrenaline ratios (1:100,000, 1:80,000, and 1:200,000) on anesthesia duration and effectiveness was also analyzed. Results: Lignocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was effective in the majority of cases, with IANB being the primary technique used for lower Lignocaine was identified as the anesthetic of choice by the majority of participants, preferred for its rapid onset and adequate duration of action. Most clinicians reported that lignocaine provided effective anesthesia for routine root canal procedures when inflammation was present or additional duration was required, clinicians recommended using supplemental techniques such as intraligamentary and intraosseous. Alternative anesthetics like articaine and bupivacaine were used successfully in patients with lignocaine allergies. Conclusion: Lignocaine remains a reliable anesthetic for root canal treatments, particularly in the lower jaw, when used with appropriate techniques and adrenaline ratios. However, challenges such as inflamed tissues and patient allergies require alternative strategies, including supplemental injection techniques and the use of different anesthetic agents. Clinicians should be adaptable in their approach to ensure effective anesthesia and patient safety. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lignocaine as a local anesthetic in root canal treatment, particularly focusing on its use in lower teeth, different administration techniques, and its performance in patients with specific challenges such as inflammation or allergy.