Manufar wannan takarda ita ce nazartan yadda ‘yan siyasa suke amfani da abubuwa na ɓatanci ga abokan hamayyarsu na siyasa. Tunanin wannan takarda ya taso ne duba da yadda ‘yan siyasa suka mayar da wannan abu tamkar in babu shi to siyasar ma ba za ta yiwu ba. Wannan ya sa aka ga dacewar a shiga cikin ayyukan adabi na rubutaccen zube a gani shin ‘yarfe’ yana da asali ne tun kafuwar siyasar jam’iyyu ko kuwa bai daɗe da samuwa ba? An yi nazarin yarfe a cikin tarihin siyasa da aka kundace a cikin ayyukan rubutaccen zube. An ɗora binciken kan ra’in ‘Tarihanci’ inda ya yi jagorancin zaƙulo tarihin yarfe a harkokin siyasar ƙasar Hausa. Takardar ta gano cewa, yarfe abu ne da ya ginu a cikin siyasar jam’iyyu tun daga farkon lamari. Bugu da ƙari, har yanzu ana amfani da shi domin neman ƙarin mabiya da kuma shafa wa abokan hamayyar siyasa kashin kaji, wanda hakan kan taimaka ga samun nasara ko faɗuwa a zaɓe.

This study explores the application of large language models in ideological and political education within college English writing courses, aiming to establish a new teaching model for such courses. Taking Unit 3, “Crime and Justice,” from the textbook University Critical Thinking English Tutorial: Writing 3 as an example, the paper analyzes the implementation pathways of teaching processes facilitated by large language models, integrating ideological and political education elements across the three phases of “pre-class, in-class, and post-class.” It is found that LLM-enabled ideological and political education in English writing courses can expand the scope of college foreign language teaching theory, help cultivate college students’ English writing and critical thinking, and improve their humanistic literacy, sense of national identity, and international perspective.

This study investigates the linguistic characteristics, pragmatic functions, and legal implications of formal and humorous speech across digital media by employing a forensic linguistic and multimodal analytical framework. Drawing on data from the Indonesian comedy program Lapor Pak! and the Korean film Vincenzo, the research examines how formal and humorous utterances are constructed, interpreted, and potentially contested within online and audiovisual environments. The analysis focuses on the interplay between linguistic form, speaker intention, and contextual cues, as well as the extent to which multimodal elements—such as visual cues, sound effects, gestures, and cinematography—shape or intensify meaning. Findings reveal that formal speech, although structurally explicit, may still generate legal vulnerabilities when embedded in parody or institutional impersonation. Conversely, humorous speech, characterized by ambiguity, irony, and linguistic deviation, is prone to misinterpretation as defamation, hate speech, or harassment, particularly in digital settings lacking shared contextual knowledge. The study further argues that multimodality amplifies interpretive risks by reinforcing or altering the illocutionary force of an utterance. Overall, this research demonstrates the value of integrating pragmatic, discourse, and multimodal perspectives within forensic linguistic analysis to better understand how digital communication practices may trigger social and legal consequences. The findings contribute to the development of digital literacy, ethical communication guidelines, and more context-sensitive approaches to evaluating public speech in online environments.