ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | May 19, 2023
Factors that Affect in Selecting the Most Appropriate Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategy for Construction Disputes
Amila N.K.K.Gamage
Page no 102-114 |
10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i04.001
Disputes are inevitable in construction projects, and cost and time impacts are higher on a project’s performance and successful completion. Therefore, it is essential to prevent disputes from arising or resolve them efficiently once arise. Other than litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) strategies receive more attention from organizations due to efficiency in dispute settlement. However, when using ADR strategies for dispute resolution, it is vital to select the most suitable technique based on the dispute type and other goals of disputant parties. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the factors that impact selecting the most appropriate alternative dispute resolution strategy for construction disputes. By analyzing existing research published from 2019 to 2023, this study revealed three main factor categories that influence ADR selection decisions. Those factor categories are financial factors, organizational factors, and legal factors. This study further identified research gaps that need attention in future research.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | May 26, 2023
Effects of Partial Replacement of Cement and Lime with some Agrowaste Ashes on the Geotechnical Behaviour of Lateritic Soil
E. O. Mezie, C. M. O. Nwaiwu, C. M. Nwakaire
Page no 115-126 |
10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i04.002
In this study, the optimum stabilizer content for a poor lateritic soil intended as subgrade material for a pavement was sought. The natural soil was first characterized and classified and the soil fall into the class of A-6 based on Nigeria General Specifications for Roads and Bridges (NGSRB) AASHTO soil class for pavement construction. The soil was stabilized at three binder points of 4%, 8% and 12% which coincided with specification limits for cement based on NGSRB with the range of 7-11% recommended for soils in the class A-6. The results from the compaction tests and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests show that the suitable stabilizer falls within the specified range of 7 – 11%. Binder contents/proportions of 4% RHA, 8% RHA, 8% (50R + 50O), 4% (60C/L + 40R/O), 8% (70C/L + 30R/O), 8% (0C/L + 100R/O), 8% (50C/L + 50R/O) gave the most promising results of MDUW and UCS. In other to carry out a comprehensive investigation of the properties of the soil to determine which of the promising binder contents/proportions would be most suitable as stabilizer for the soil, it was recommended that other qualifying tests of specific gravity, Atterberg limits, CBR, UCS, durability and permeability tests be carried out for these recommended binder contents/proportions.