The Regional Regulation (Perda) is one of the regional regulations jointly determined by the Regional Head and DPRD to regulate regional affairs as stated in Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government junto Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. Regional legal products in the form of stipulations and regulations, regional legal products in the form of regulations are regional regulations and regional head regulations. The problem that will be examined in this research is the authority in the formation of regional legal products in further regulating the provisions of other laws and regulations, the aspect of supervision is very necessary. In this regard, how is the supervision of regional legal products, both Perda and Perkada. The method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that the Regional Regulation contains material for the implementation of regional autonomy and assistance tasks; and further elaboration of higher statutory provisions while the Regulation of the Regional Head is an elaboration of the regional regulation in the context of implementing the Regional Regulation, because the Regional Regulation expressly orders to make implementing regulations of the Regional Regulation in the form of the Regional Head Regulation. The implementation of supervision of regional regulations is carried out by means of preventive supervision and repressive supervision, that regional regulations and regional head regulations are prepared based on the authority and substance of their content that does not conflict with the public interest and higher laws and regulations.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | April 25, 2022
Principle of Prosecutors Independency in Deponering Criminal Cases for Public Interest in Indonesia
Didik Kurniawan, Heni Siswanto, Dini Nurina Chairani
Page no 161-168 |
10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i04.002
The deponering of criminal cases is one of the Attorney General powers to not prosecute. Deponering is the implementation of the opportunity principle given by law to the Attorney General as a public prosecutor to deponering cases for public interest. The opportunity principle allows the public prosecutor not to prosecute an alleged criminal act with public interest as background because it is feared that by prosecuting it will cause more harm than not suing. This research wants to see whether the deponering of cases in the public interest based on the opportunity principle; what are the limitations in the public interest for the deponering of criminal cases (seponering); and what are the juridical consequences of deponering the case.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | April 25, 2022
Law Enforcement of Corruption in the Police: Assessing Law Enforcers Integrity
Agus Rohmat, Eriyantouw Wahid, Gunawan Djajaputra
Page no 169-176 |
10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i04.003
Corruption within the Police can be committed by anyone regardless of educational background, ethnicity, rank, or position. Starting from the lowest to the highest ranks and positions, even though they are not free from the temptation of corruption. The research uses a qualitative approach with case study research by collecting data through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. This research is descriptive-analytical. The results show that law enforcement that is conducted against police personnel who commit criminal acts of corruption is indeed carried out with the principle of “enforce the law using the law” through all existing regulations; however, the sanctions given are never or rarely as much as possible as stated in the law. This fact is law enforcement that does not wholeheartedly use the law. The implementation of law enforcement against police who commit corruption crimes is normatively carried out by combining the criminal sanctions and internal sanctions, such as dishonorable dismissals by Police institution. According to the existing laws and regulations, ideal law enforcement for police personnel who commit criminal acts of corruption must be carried out by prioritizing the combination of criminal sanctions, internal sanctions and widely publicized in Indonesian society as social sanctions.
REVIEW ARTICLE | April 30, 2022
The Legal Aspect of GPS Technology as Means of Safeguarding National Security
Ibrahim Shehu
Page no 178-181 |
10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i04.004
The whole world is faced with different kind of insecurity challenges. To tackle the current insecurity and safeguarding the national security of a particular nation, there is the need to make effective use of GPS technology. For Nigeria to tackle the current insecurity problems, GPS technology must be fully utilized in tackling and destroying different types of security threat bedeviling the nation, ranging from the Boko Haram terrorist, the economic terrorist in the Niger Delta, kidnappers, Armed Robbers and the herdsmen and other criminal gangs around the country. The focal point of this paper is to examine the legal aspect of GPS technology on the development of national security. The paper will recommend possible ways of improvement.