Spinal trauma is very common in orthopedic practice. There is a debate as to whether the surgical or conservative approach is more effective in the treatment of spine fractures. We in the present study tried to evaluate the outcomes of patients with spinal fractures treated with the conservative treatment and surgical treatment and overall outcome of treatment in the patients. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of orthopedics, MGM hospital attached to Kakatiya Medical College. A total of 30 patients were included in the study of which (n=15) patients were treated with conservative treatment based on the presentation of fractures and similarly (n=15) were taken for operative treatment depending on the type of fractures. A Detailed history of the injury was obtained they were clinically and radiologically evaluated for the thoracolumbar fracture. The radiographs included the anteroposterior and lateral views. Laboratory investigations were carried out before the surgery. CT and MRI scans were carried out to evaluate the relationship and instability of the spine. Results: The L1 vertebra was the most common to get fractured and most of the fractures (74%) were appeared at T12 and L1. AO type, A fractures were only studied with the majority of the fractures (66.6) were falling into AO type A3 (burst fractures). DENIS pain scale scores in conservative treatment, category 8 (53.3%) of patients were in the P3 category similarly in operative treatment 46.67 % of patients were in P1 category...