This article discusses the factors that cause the State Administration Agency or Official (TUN Agency or Official) unable to realize a PTUN decision execution that is in accordance with the Pancasila Justice Value currently; and how to reconstruct the execution regulations of the PTUN decisions based on the values of Pancasila justice In a study using the constructivism paradigm and the method of the socio-legal research approach. The data sources in this study consist of primary data sources and secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials related to the analysis of qualitative descriptive data. The results of the discussion show that the weaknesses that cause the State Administration Agency or Official (TUN Agency or Official) unable to realize a PTUN decision execution that is in accordance with the Pancasila Justice Value currently include 4 things, namely: (1) low compliance and legal awareness of the State Administration Agency or Official; (2) low legal compliance and awareness of the community; (3) the existence of the interests of state administration officials; and (4) there is an error in vision in the use of the authority of his position. Then, the Reconstruction of this regulation is as follows: paragraph (3) regarding the grace period for submitting an application for execution; Paragraph (4) regarding forced efforts, administrative sanctions are emphasized in the form of disciplinary action on dismissal from office; the addition of paragraph (5), regarding the synergy of the implementation of the decision; the addition of paragraph (6) regarding the contempt of court for officials and related parties who do not comply with the decision; paragraph (7) changes regarding hierarchical execution, to execution carried out by an executing agency; paragraph (7) is old, deleted because it is no longer using forced money, and administrative sanctions have been regulated in paragraph (4).