The purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the weaknesses of legal protection construction arrangements for legal aid institutions in providing legal assistance to the community at this time to then construct gnats that can fulfill the value of justice using the constructivism paradigm. The approach method used is sociological juridical, with the research specification is descriptive analysis. The data used are primary data and secondary data, which are then analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the weaknesses of the legal protection of Legal Aid Institutions in providing legal assistance to the community, namely the Legal Aid Institutions have not been specifically formulated in the Legal Aid Law and the legal aid needs of vulnerable groups such as children, women, the community adat and persons with disabilities have not been regulated in the Legal Aid Law, the APBN / APBD is limited, and doubts over the central-regional authority to issue Legal Aid Regional Law (Perda) is still low; as well as a lack of public awareness of legal methods and the importance of legal aid. To overcome this, it is necessary to reconstruct the legal protection of Legal Aid Institutions in providing legal assistance to the community so that it can fulfill the value of justice, namely to the specific formulation of the definition of legal aid institutions in the Legal Aid Law, and additional provisions of legal aid to vulnerable groups, affirming that legal aid is the authority of the central and regional governments, and strengthening regional authority to issue a Legal Aid Perda; as well as fostering and counseling public legal awareness of the importance of legal aid.