Written Language Ergonomics: Exploring Expressive and Impressive ways of Communication
Abstract
Sometimes writing impressively gratifies the writer, while writing
expressively not only satisfies, but also benefits the reader. If so, writers who write to
impress themselves had better keep their written work for their personal reading. How
writers use language is critical, because it determines how meanings of their ideas are
received, interpreted and acted upon (herein referred to as language ergonomics). This
paper reviews literature from English language authorities on well—writing to
express. It is about using a short, specific, concrete, common, and positive word;
about using a strong verb and the active voice; about using a word that means what it
is supposed to mean. That is all about effective writing as defined by eight Cs:
Concise, saying what needs to be said using only the necessary words; Choice, using
suitable words; Compelling, saying it in a way that makes the listener or reader pay
attention; Compliant, obeying relevant language rules. It is also defined as Consistent,
avoiding contradictions, i.e. being in agreement with what the experts say; Clear,
using a simple and direct way so that listeners or readers understand it easily;
Coherent, saying it in a logical and organised way; Concrete, trying to be as definite
and as specific as possible. The researcher discovers through analysis that great
writers use both adverbs and adjectives sparingly to avoid wastage. While adjectives
overwhelm nouns, adverbs weaken verbs. Wordsmiths prefer strong verbs to
modifiers, opt for concrete words as opposed to abstract ones, go in for a variety of
sentences rather than only long-winded ones, and choose the active voice other than
passive. If writers chose to follow these simple rules, communication objectives could
be achieved.