Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (SJHSS)
Volume-2 | Issue-02 | 155-168
Review Article
Russian versus Soviet Military Mobilization in World Wars I and II: A Reassessment
Ioannis-Dionysios Salavrakos
Published : Feb. 28, 2017
Abstract
The paper demolishes an old myth which the Soviet Union created after 1945. The myth is associated with the
victory of USSR against Germany and its allies in Europe during the Second World War. According to the Soviet Union,
the “Great Patriotic War” of 1941-1945, was won because of Stalin leadership and due to the efficient economic
industrial mobilization which the Communist GOSPLAN Central Economic Committee imposed on the economy. The
Soviet era argument compares the victory of 1945 with the defeat of capitalist Russia in 1917, and claims that the
communist organization of the war economy has been very successful compared to the poor organization of capitalist
Russia of 1914-1917 period. The reality is different. The USSR was both heavier industrialized and armed compared to
the Empire of the Czar in 1914. However the USSR suffered more defeats, human and material losses as well as
catastrophes compared to those of the Russian Empire. And these developments occurred as the country enjoyed greater
military and economic aid from the US and Great Britain compared to what was granted to Czarist Russia during 1914-
1917. The biggest paradox however is associated with the post-war settlements. The humiliating defeat which the Czarist
Empire suffered in World War I -and was sealed with the Treaty of Brest Litovsk signed by Lenin- was never
implemented since the Western Allies with the victory of 1918 simply abolished the Treaty. Thus the defeat of 1917
practically did not have a negative outcome. The 1945 victory generated the huge expansion of Soviet sphere of power in
Eastern Europe but the cost of victory was so high that the final outcome can be considered as a pyrrhic victory.